cnsme / govbuy route × reality × statute
An MCP server · UK public procurement

The public-procurement co-pilot.

Ask your AI assistant how to buy a thing across the UK public sector, where to sell it as a vendor, or how public money flows as a researcher — and get a complete, source-anchored, decision-grade answer. Route × reality × statute, in one place.

claude mcp add --transport http govbuy https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp

Works with any MCP client — Claude, Claude Code, and the rest. Free & unauthenticated.

3,214frameworks & dynamic markets
117,829catalogue listings
741,176real awards fused in
£1.8tnof awarded contract value
Watch it work

Real questions, answered live

Buyers, sellers and researchers ask in plain English; govbuy answers from the live corpus. Every figure and chart in this demo is computed from govbuy_public at build time — 60 questions on rotation, always current, never scripted. Hover to pause · click a chip to jump.

govbuy · via your AI assistantlive
Researcher
Is the public sector overpaying for health & social work by buying through frameworks?
No — the framework median (£295k) sits 88% below open tender (£2.5m); open competition captures the mega-projects that pull its median up. 3,941 call-offs vs 15,685 open.
Median award · Health & social work
Framework call-off
£295k
Open tender
£2.5m
1 / 60 · answered from govbuy_public as of 2026-10-30
What it holds

Three layers no other tool welds together

01

Route

3,214 frameworks, DPS & dynamic markets across 185 operators — every lot, mechanic and document a compliant purchase needs — plus 117,829 catalogue listings of what suppliers actually sell, searchable by capability.

02

Reality

741,176 real tender awards joined on Companies House CRN: who actually wins the work, what buyers really pay, what's live, what's coming (1,917 planned procurements still ahead) and what's expiring.

Explore the data

Real numbers from the corpus — not a brochure

Every figure below is live from govbuy_public as of 2026-10-30 — the same data your assistant reasons over.

Method, plainly: figures are over award records (one per award×supplier line, 741,176 of them across 57,952 appointed-supplier edges) from the fused UK-Tenders corpus. Framework-ceiling outliers (>£100m) are removed so medians aren't distorted; the price explorer uses awards ≥£1,000. Totals are sums over award records and are not de-duplicated across multi-supplier awards, so they read as gross awarded value, not net spend. Reseller £ come from a curated reseller-graph join across every CPV a firm operates in. Dirty upstream dates are bounded by each chart's window. Counts of instrument/service are exact. Nothing here is hand-entered — re-run scripts/build-site.mjs to reproduce.

Interactive · pick a sector

Framework call-off vs open tender — what you really pay

The conventional wisdom is that frameworks save money. At the median they mostly don't — open tender captures the mega-projects, so its median sits higher in most sectors. The revealing exception is IT, where the call-off median runs above open: a real convenience premium on the routine middle of the market.

£1816bn mapped

How public money is awarded

Awarded spend by channel. Open tender dominates by value (the big programmes); framework & DPS call-offs are the high-volume routine layer.

Open tender
£1.2tn · 176,227
Other / unclassified
£344bn · 133,484
Framework call-off
£154bn · 121,266
Direct award
£50bn · 69,097
DPS call-off
£39bn · 21,629
The intermediary layer

£4.5bn flows through resellers

Thin-primes & VARs that carry other firms onto frameworks — the public buyer often never contracts who does the work.

Softcat thin-prime
£1.1bn · 1,146
£882m · 548
CDW UK hybrid
£565m · 443
£415m · 299
£366m · 137
boxxe thin-prime
£268m · 418
XMA thin-prime
£239m · 281
£239m · 30
£111m · 91
Sortable · click a header

The frameworks that actually move money

Attributable call-off spend per framework (CRN-joined from real awards). Sort by spend, awards or supplier breadth.

#Framework Call-off £ ▾ Awards Suppliers
1 RM6100
£1.0bn 182 63
2 Construction Works and Associated Services (RM6088)
£806m 71 29
3 Technology Products & Associated Services 2 (RM6098)
£710m 579 71
4 Technology Products & Associated Services (RM6068)
£627m 767 49
5 Media Services (RM6123)
£623m 31 9
6 Supply of Energy and Ancillary Services (RM6011)
£425m 16 4
7 RM1056
£394m 20 6
8 Workforce Solutions (RM6288)
£373m 22 2
9 RM3804
£368m 76 36
10 Research & Insights (RM6126)
£329m 583 128
11 Digital Specialists and Programmes (RM6263)
£327m 35 18
12 G-Cloud 14 (RM1557.13)
£283m 676 313
Who wins · IT, last 12 months

The five busiest suppliers won one IT award in six

6,177 IT awards (CPV 72, 48, 30) across 898 buyers. The busiest five suppliers took 973 of them, or 15.8%. Only 4.8% went through open tender. The median award is £144k. 1,912 of these contracts end within 12 months and 1,288 within six. Counted by award, not £, because notice £ is mostly framework ceilings. Supplier names are merged across spellings and CRNs, so shares are indicative. Ask research({concentration:true}) for the same numbers.

SoftCat
404 · 6.5% · 184 buyers
Phoenix Software
217 · 3.5% · 135 buyers
Insight Direct
129 · 2.1% · 83 buyers
Civica
126 · 2.0% · 87 buyers
Bytes Software Services
97 · 1.6% · 63 buyers
CDW Ltd
92 · 1.5% · 57 buyers
Specialist Computer Centres
90 · 1.5% · 60 buyers
Permanent Futures Ltd
73 · 1.2% · 7 buyers
£264bn re-procurement wave

Contracts expiring — the next 18 months

Every bar is real contract-end value. For buyers: re-procurement deadlines. For sellers: displacement windows.

Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2027
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2028
Feb
Mar
Apr
117,829 listings · 6 catalogues

What's actually on the shelves

Per-listing descriptions across every public UK buying catalogue, searchable by capability — token-free re-crawled.

43,733
23,459
11,621
40
Who's spending · open gov.uk data

Award value by public-sector layer

Every distinct buyer is typed deterministically from its own name + the open gov.uk organisations register — no fuzzy cross-entity matching, so nothing's mislabelled. A further £684bn sits in genuinely ambiguous names (shown as unclassified in the data, omitted here). Supplier-side, the same open feeds add SME / region / sector, corporate-group ownership and modern-slavery flags — all on supplier().

Local government
£605bn · 1,553 buyers
Central government
£271bn · 684 buyers
NHS / health
£170bn · 1,051 buyers
Education
£39bn · 1,688 buyers
Housing / combined authority
£33bn · 350 buyers
Police
£10bn · 197 buyers
Fire & rescue
£2.9bn · 86 buyers
Ask it anything

Real questions, real answers

A sample of what people actually ask — across buyer, seller and researcher. Every answer is genuine claude -p output, source-anchored, with the URLs to verify.

Buyer

I'm a council. I need to host a containerised web app for ~£80k/year. Just tell me how to buy it.

buy → G-Cloud 14 call-off, a ranked shortlist with real delivery records, the ~£184k IT median, alternative routes, and the PA2023 steps — one brief.

Buyer

A fire service needs drone thermal-imaging kit fast and compliantly — is a direct award allowed?

YPO Drones DPS 1148 — further competition only, no direct award; the Schedule 5 urgency route explained, with the Feb-2029 DPS sunset flagged.

Seller

I've built an AI triage tool but I'm on no framework. How do I get in front of the NHS this quarter?

Get admitted to an AI dynamic market (RM6200 / HealthTrust) — continuous joining; plus where NHS commissioners actually shop.

Seller

Find me an incumbent on a big contract that's expiring, and how to compete.

sell surfaces the displacement window — incumbents whose contracts are ending, value, end date, the route to re-bid.

Seller

I rent out goats that clear invasive scrub. How do I sell conservation grazing to the public sector?

An honest answer: no grazing framework exists; the money flows via grounds-maintenance primes — subcontract, and chase sub-threshold local notices.

Researcher

Is the public sector overpaying by buying IT through framework call-offs instead of open competition?

In IT the median call-off (£184k) runs above open tender (£144k) — a ~28% convenience premium; every other sector inverts.

Researcher

Map the 'thin-prime' economy — who fronts other firms onto public frameworks, and how much flows there?

£4.5bn of call-off spend traced to the reseller layer — Softcat, Phoenix, CDW, Bramble Hub…

Researcher

Which 'live' tech frameworks are dead paper — appointed suppliers but no real spend?

It tells you what it can prove and what it can't — separating genuinely-idle frameworks from attribution gaps.

7 verbs, 3 personas

Ask the way you think — buy, sell, draft, research

Buyer

  • buyone opinionated brief: route + PA2023 mechanic + ranked shortlist (track record + exclusion) + price + alternative routes + compliance checklist
  • supplieris this firm safe? a two-limb live exclusion check + framework footprint + CRN-matched delivery record + an SME/sector/region lens + corporate-group rollup + a modern-slavery-statement flag
  • frameworkone instrument: lots, appointed suppliers (incl. per-lot), observed-from-awards, coverage, and the PA2023-precise call-off path
  • draftscaffolding to START the procurement: a real-dated timetable, a MEAT matrix skeleton, a spec outline, the compliance steps, a Schedule 5 / s.44 stub

Seller

  • sellyour route to market: frameworks & live DPS you can join, ranked by REAL call-off spend, live + forward opportunities, incumbents to displace, and resellers who can carry you in
  • watcha re-runnable saved query for contract expiries or the forward pipeline — diff successive runs to spot what changed

Researcher

  • researchthe power surface: read-only BigQuery SQL over the whole corpus, a spend & competition x-ray by CPV, or the schema / freshness & coverage
Connect it

Set it up in your assistant — in a minute

govbuy is a remote Model-Context-Protocol server at https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp — streamable HTTP, free, unauthenticated, no API key. Add the URL to any MCP-capable client and the seven verbs appear. Recipes (current as of 2026-10-30 — each links its official docs):

Claude — one-click plugin ★

Bundles the MCP + a skill + slash commands
/plugin marketplace add chrisns/govbuy
/plugin install govbuy@cns
Then run /govbuy:start. Approve the MCP server when prompted.Docs →

Claude Code

Terminal — one command
claude mcp add --transport http govbuy https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp
Then ask Claude anything about UK procurement.Docs →

Claude Desktop

Settings → Developer → Edit Config
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "govbuy": { "type": "http", "url": "https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp" }
  }
}
Add to claude_desktop_config.json, then restart.Docs →

GitHub Copilot (VS Code)

Create .vscode/mcp.json (or ⌘⇧P → “MCP: Add Server”)
{
  "servers": {
    "govbuy": { "type": "http", "url": "https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp" }
  }
}
Use in Copilot Chat → Agent mode.Docs →

Gemini CLI

Edit ~/.gemini/settings.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "govbuy": { "httpUrl": "https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp" }
  }
}
Gemini uses httpUrl for streamable-HTTP servers.Docs →

Cursor

Edit ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "govbuy": { "url": "https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp" }
  }
}
Or Settings → MCP → Add new server.Docs →

Any MCP client

Windsurf, Zed, Cline, LibreChat, n8n…
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "govbuy": { "type": "http", "url": "https://govbuy.run.cns.me/mcp" }
  }
}
Point any Model-Context-Protocol client at the URL.Docs →
The honest part

What it can't do — and says so

Credibility is in the candour. govbuy never fabricates: every supplier, framework and £ comes from a source that literally states it, behind a verbatim-substring gate.

  • No published supplier list. 690 of 3,116 live frameworks publish no member list (login-walled portals, or DPS/neutral-vendor models that don't publish membership) — govbuy says so rather than guessing.
  • Attribution gaps. Most awards carry no framework reference, so a flagship showing low spend is often an attribution gap, not dead paper — and it tells you which.
  • Backfilled, labelled. Where an official list is missing, 4,129 supplier×framework edges are inferred from real awards — clearly marked observed-not-official.
  • Not legal advice. It documents routes; it doesn't assemble the purchase or sign off compliance. Confirm on the official source it links.
🦩
Built by cns.me

If this is the kind of thing you need built — let's talk.

govbuy is one example of how cns.me turns a messy, high-stakes domain into something an AI can reason over precisely. Strategy, data, and the engineering to make it real.